Authors: Farea Hanif, Muhammad Irfan Qasmi, Komal kumari, Muhammad Faizan, Amna Faraz
Affiliations:
- Farea Hanif BS (Scholar) Department of Psychology, Quaid e Azam University fareahanif@gmail.com
- Muhammad Irfan Qasmi BS (Scholar) Department of Peace and Counter -Terrorism Studies, Minhaj University Lahore yahyaahmedshah2004@gmail.com
- Komal Kumari BS (Scholar) Department of Forensic Science, Liaquat university of Medical & Health Sciences Kumarikomal7715@gmail.com
- Muhammad Faizan BS (Scholar) Department of Criminology, University of Lahore faizan2007majeed@gmail.com
- Amna Faraz BS (Scholar) Department of Criminology, University of Sargodha amnafaraz440@gmail.com
Abstract:
The Javed Iqbal serial murder case is a notorious criminal case in the history of Pakistan. Javed Iqbal admitted to the abduction, sexual abuse, murder, and dismemberment of 100 young street boys in Lahore. This case exposed major weaknesses in law enforcement, child protection systems, and the criminal justice system, while raising concerns about the psychological condition of serial offenders. This qualitative case study draws upon primary judicial sources, including the Lahore Sessions Court judgment and Federal Shariat Court proceedings, supplemented by peer-reviewed journal articles, books, and authentic academic sources, using a purposive sampling technique to select relevant documents. Using directed qualitative content analysis, primary and secondary documents were mapped against established psychological and criminological theoretical frameworks. The findings show that psychopathic personality traits, deviant sexual interests, routine activity opportunities, and failures in social control contributed to the commission of the crimes. It also shows the weak police investigations and delayed interventions that allowed the offenses to continue for an extended period. This study highlights the value of detailed psychological profiling within criminological theory to understand serial homicide and improve investigative strategies while strengthening child protection mechanisms, enhancing law enforcement practices, and developing offender profiling techniques to help prevent similar crimes.
Keywords: Serial Homicide, Psychopathy, Routine Activity Theory, Child Victim, Javed Iqbal
Introduction:
Javed Iqbal Mughal aka “Kukri” was a notorious Pakistani serial killer who claimed that he had killed 100 boys between ages 7-17 years. He confessed to his crimes in a detailed letter sent to Jang Newspaper and later he surrendered himself to the authorities in the same newspaper’s head office in Lahore, Pakistan. Reporting draws on family testimony describing someone withdrawn on the surface but manipulative and controlling underneath. This behavioral dichotomy aligns with established offender profile literature, supported in this instance by family testimony. Family members also describe a nearobsessive attachment to order and cleanliness, which later shows up, unmistakably, in how precisely he managed the killings and disposed of evidence. According to another research the death of Iqbal's father in the 1990s coincided with his escalating behavioral decline, suggesting a potential loss of informal social control (Sohail, 2002) According to Iqbal, everything started after two of his servants allegedly assaulted him, he reported the incident to the police, but they arrested him instead of taking action against the alleged attackers and this experience marked a turning point in his life. He stated that being treated as a suspect rather than a victim influenced his decision for retaliation. In his words: "Then I prayed that if I left the world, I would leave it with dozens of others." He claimed to have made a vow at Data Darbar, the well-known Lahore shrine, to kill 100 children: "I prayed at Data Darbar that I would kill 100 children; in this way, I would take revenge on the world I hated" (BBC News, 1999). The Federal Shariat Court's 2007 judgment states that the murders occurred between August 20 to November 13, 1999-six months, 100 victims. Iqbal killed 100 children, with nearly one murder every other day. The fact that these crimes remained undetected for several months reflects both of his ability to carefully plan his actions and the serious institutional failures that allowed the killings to continue for a long time.
Victim Selection:
Javed Iqbal went after street children specifically runaways, orphans, boys with no fixed address, between 6 and 16 years old. The setup was deliberate a gaming shop in Shad Bagh, later a fish aquarium, later still a gym each one dressed up as an ordinary neighborhood business but functioning as bait. Free game tokens, cheap goods, occasionally cash left on the floor for a boy to notice and pick up, at which point Iqbal would accuse him of theft and pull him aside "for punishment”. Street children were targeted due to their extreme structural vulnerability, as the absence of active parental supervision or institutional tracking minimized the risk of immediate missing-persons reports. Framework of the "ideal victim" maps onto this almost too cleanly these were children rendered invisible well before Iqbal ever laid eyes on them. His preference for boys tracks his pedophilic interests; his preference for the marginalized and unaccounted-for tracks something closer to risk management (Christie ,1986). Reporting mentions that he maintained a running record of names, ages, and dates of death, with photographs frequently taken while the boys were smiling, not long before they were murdered. That last detail is hard to file under simple record-keeping. Smiling photographs taken just before death suggest something closer to a need to memorialize the act, maybe even to relive it later (New York Times, 2000).
Modus Operandi:
The killing method stayed remarkably consistent throughout. Boys were drawn in with offers of food, shelter, work the usual promises. Iqbal first assault them sexually, then killed them, either by strangulation while they slept or by forcing them to inhale a cyanide-acid mixture. The bodies were then cut apart and dissolved in hydrochloric acid. His post-arrest statements reflected a profound lack of empathy and a purely transactional view of his offenses: "In terms of expense, including the acid, it cost me 120 rupees ($2.40) to erase each victim" (BBC News, 2000). He kept meticulous records the entire time names, ages, dates and held onto shoes and personal effects taken from each boy. After the 43rd killing, he bought a camera, and from then on, most victims were photographed, often smiling, sometimes without a shirt. The acid served two purposes at once, it disposed of the bodies, and it erased the evidence that might have identified them. The Federal Shariat Court's 2007 judgment states directly that "the bodies of the deceased were not recovered due to acid dissolution," which meant forensic identification was, for most victims, simply off the table. The whole case broke open because Iqbal chose to send a confession letter to police, and separately to a Lahore newspaper editor in December 1999. That letter led investigators straight to his house, where they found photographs and clothing tied to 100 boys, remains from two bodies, and two barrels of acid. Police recovered decomposed remains belonging to three children, plus bundled clothing, shoes, and a photo album. A nationwide manhunt ensued, during which Iqbal evaded capture for nearly a month, highlighting significant investigative and operational gaps within local law enforcement at the time. On December 30, 1999, he walked into the lobby of the Jang newspaper's Lahore office and turned himself in: “I am Javed Iqbal, killer of 100 boys”. His plan, apparently, had been to write out a full written confession, but he was afraid police would kill him before he got the chance. Staff called in the military, and more than 100 soldiers were dispatched to secure the building. The available records give relatively little attention to the victims within Iqbal's own account of the offenses. Reducing each murder to a 120rupee line item is instrumental thinking in its purest form the same logic shows up in his remark that his crimes would leave "100 mothers" mourning their children. Nowhere in the record does anything resembling remorse appear, not for the boys, not for their families. And running alongside that emotional flatness is an explicit revenge narrative: he frames the killings as payback for police mistreatment, and his line “I hate this world” sits close to whatever passed for the emotional center of his self-justification. Iqbal also claimed that the murders fulfilled a vow he had made at a religious shrine. By using religious symbolism, he appeared to frame the offenses as justified rather than acknowledging their criminal nature. The sexual abuse committed during the murders, together with Iqbal's earlier arrests for sodomy, appears consistent with a long-standing pedophilic interest that predated the killings. Combine that with the lethal violence and you get a configuration sexual deviance layered onto homicidal aggression that shows up rarely, and dangerously, in the broader literature on serial offenders. And despite the apparent chaos of murdering 100 children, the operational reality was anything but disordered: detailed logs, systematic photography, a body-disposal method chosen specifically to defeat identification. That is not disorganized violence instead organized violence, executed by someone whose cognitive capacities were very much intact and working in service of something much darker.
Literature Review
Conceptualizing Serial Homicide and Victim Dynamics The killing of three or more victims over a period of more than thirty days, with a cooling-off time in between, is known as serial homicide, and it is one of the most bizarre forms of human violence (Morton, 2008). Tjhe driving forces behind serial murders are power, control, and psychological gratification (Holmes & Holmes, 2009). The Javed Iqbal case, in which the perpetrator admitted to killing 100 street children between 1998 and 1999, is the biggest serial killing case in Pakistan (Dawn, 2001). Despite numerous documented occurrences in the region, serial homicide has received much less attention in South Asian contexts than it has in Western nations. This is because the selection of vulnerable juvenile victims reveals particular psychopathological and environmental factors. child victimization in serial homicides poses unique obstacles to understanding the offender’s motivation.
Child Victimization:
Child victimization is another significant worldwide issue. In accordance with their physical and emotional vulnerability, criminals who target children exploit poverty, homelessness, a lack of parental supervision, and poor social protection institutions. Serial killers choose their victims carefully because they are less likely to report abuse or get help from the police right away (Finkelhor, 2008; Hickey, 2015). The victimization of children in serial homicides is a particularly troubling topic in criminological research. In criminological literature, the victimization of minors in cases of serial killings holds a particularly disturbing place. Because of their vulnerability, lack of social protection, and lower chance of being reported missing, children-especially those from underprivileged backgrounds like street childrenrepresent "perfect victims" from the offender's perspective (Christie, 1986). Systematic victimization can go unnoticed for an extended period of time due to a combination of perpetrator psychopathology, social ignorance, and child fragility. Studies have repeatedly shown that serial killers who target children have unique psychological traits, such as pedophilic tendencies, severe empathy deficiencies, and frequently, histories of abuse or trauma during childhood (Lanning, 2010; Beauregard & Proulx, 2002). However, there is still a large gap in the literature regarding the cultural and contextual variables influencing serial child killing in non-Western settings. One of Pakistan's shocking criminal cases is still the Javed Iqbal serial murder case. the court documents reveal that he destroyed evidence by dissolving the remains of their bodies in acid. The seriousness of the offenses and his confession overwhelmed the country and received international media attention (Supreme Court of Pakistan, 2006).
Offender Psychology:
The psychological study of serial killers identified many consistent features among serial offenders, including psychopathy, narcissism, antisocial personality disorder, and various paraphilias. Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R) shows core features including glibness/superficial charm, grandiose sense of self-worth, pathological lying, cunning/manipulative behavior, lack of remorse or guilt, shallow affect, callousness/lack of empathy, and parasitic lifestyle (Hare ,2013) In Iqbal's case, multiple sources indicate the presence of psychopathic traits. The psychoanalytic interpretation reveals "Iqbal's psychopathy, characterized by a lack of superego and conscience" (Kamrani, 2024). His grandiosity is evidenced by his boastful statements about his crimes, his claim that he could have killed 500 children, and his dramatic surrender designed to attract maximum attention. The concept of the "power/control" motive in serial homicide is particularly relevant to understanding Iqbal. Many researchers have found that sexual fulfillment is a secondary or instrumental motivation for some serial killers who are primarily driven by a need for dominance and control (Holmes & Holmes, 2009). Iqbal's need for recognition and his boastful confessions suggest that power and control, as well as notoriety, were central to his motivational structure.
Methodology:
This study employed Directed Qualitative Content Analysis (Theoretical Mapping) to analyze the collected data. Because established theoretical frameworks already exist regarding serial homicide, psychopathy, and victimology, this approach enabled deductive coding based on existing theoretical categories (Hsieh & Shannon ,2005). Data extracted from primary judicial judgments, news archives, and case documentation were systematically classified across three analytical dimensions:
- Psychological and Personality Mapping: Deductive coding was conducted using core dimensions from Hare’s Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R), specifically identifying indicators of callousness, lack of remorse, grandiosity, and pathologically deceptive manipulation.
- Criminological and Environmental Mapping: Spatial and situational variables were coded through the lens of Routine Activity Theory, focusing on the convergence of motivated offenders, suitable targets, and the absence of capable guardians alongside Social Control Theory.
- Judicial and Legal Discourse Mapping: Statutory provisions, constitutional guarantees, and international human rights standards were mapped against the judicial reasoning and legal findings in the judgments.
Research Questions:
- Which psychological factors and personality traits contributed to Javed Iqbal’s criminal behavior?
- How do criminological theories explain the victim selection, modus operandi, and overall offending trajectory in the Javed Iqbal case?
- What were the primary features of the judicial response to the case, and what legal and human rights concerns arise from the sentences imposed?
Sampling and Document Corpus:
In the present research study purposive sampling technique was used to establish an authentic, credible, and comprehensive document corpus. This study relies on both primary and secondary sources to ensure reliability and validity. Primary sources provided direct legal and factual documentation of the case, while secondary sources provided peer-reviewed psychological and criminological context along with academic books.
Coding Procedure and Theoretical Mapping:
The data analysis followed a structured three-phase deductive coding protocol outlined by Hsieh and Shannon (2005):
- Establishing the A Priori Codebook: Prior to text analysis, operational definitions and key coding categories were established directly from the four guiding theoretical frameworks (Psychopathy, Social Learning, Strain, and Routine Activity Theories).
- Deductive Data Coding: The document corpus was systematically analyzed. Text segments from court judgments and scholarly articles detailing offender behaviors, systemic breakdowns, or psychological traits were highlighted and mapped directly onto the corresponding a priori theoretical categories.
- Handling Residual Data: To mitigate confirmation bias, any qualitative data within the legal judgments that did not fit the four pre-established theoretical categories was flagged separately. These residual segments underwent secondary analysis to identify localized legal, religious, or cultural nuances specific to Pakistan's judicial context.
Data Quality and Trustworthiness:
To ensure analytical rigor and trustworthiness, data triangulation was achieved by cross-analyzing apex court rulings alongside peer-reviewed scholarly literature. Methodological validity was maintained by adhering strictly to predefined theoretical criteria during the mapping process. (Lincoln & Guba, 1985)
Ethical Considerations and Research Rigor:
This study was conducted under high ethical standards to responsibly handle historical data on extreme sexual violence and child abuse. Primary judicial records and archival media sources were treated with high analytical objectivity. In accordance with qualitative ethical guidelines, no identifiable information regarding living relatives or surviving victim families was disclosed beyond what exists in public court records. Methodological trustworthiness was evaluated using Lincoln and Guba’s (1985) criteria: credibility was established through document triangulation across apex court rulings and peer-reviewed literature; dependability was ensured via an explicit, reproducible codebook; and confirmability was maintained by auditing theoretical interpretations against original primary legal judgments.
Results and Findings:
Deductive Theoretical Mapping Applying the directed qualitative content analysis framework to the legal corpus (Supreme Court of Pakistan and Federal Shariat Court judgments) revealed distinct alignments and boundary conditions for each guiding theoretical model.
Psychopathy Theory Alignment:
A directed qualitative content analysis of the primary judicial documentation demonstrates a strong alignment between the offender's recorded behaviors and the theoretical constructs of psychopathy (Hare). Rather than relying on general commentary, the deductive mapping links specific textual evidence from court judgments directly to these established theoretical categories.
Premeditation and Behavioral Mapping:
Primary judicial records document that the offender maintained meticulous handwritten registries, photographic logs, and systematic accounting of the victims both prior to and following their deaths. When coded under premeditated planning and serial patterns, these operational indicators demonstrate a highly organized, calculated style of offending. The court text reveals a cognitive structure where victims were systematically processed, directly reflecting the structured behavioral patterns outlined in psychopathy theory.
Affective Detachment and Absence of Remorse:
Appellate reviews and trial court observations explicitly highlight the offender’s flat affect, total lack of distress, and complete absence of remorse during formal confessions and judicial proceedings. Coded under absence of remorse and lack of affective empathy, these observations align directly with the core affective dimensions of Hare’s Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R), specifically callousness and a total lack of remorse. The trial record documents a severe deficit in emotional processing, empirically anchoring these theoretical dimensions within the primary legal findings.
Pathological Manipulation and Grandiosity:
Case files and legal records emphasize the offender's deliberate strategy of dispatching sensational letters to public authorities and media outlets, alongside calculated post-crime statements intended to manipulate public awareness. Coded as manipulative disposition, public letters, and post-crime disclosures, these textual indicators map directly onto the interpersonal dimensions of the PCL-R— specifically grandiosity and pathologically deceptive manipulation. The judicial record shows that postarrest disclosures were weaponized not out of contrition, but as a calculated effort to maintain narrative control over the legal process.
General Strain Theory as a Catalytic Motive:
A directed qualitative content analysis of the primary court records demonstrates that the offender’s trajectory was heavily catalyzed by perceived acute grievances against the justice system (Agnew, 1992). Deductive theoretical mapping links the explicit operational indicators found in judicial findings and offender statements directly to the core tenets of General Strain Theory.
Systemic Grievances and Noxious Stimuli:
Primary judicial records document explicit allegations of prior police mistreatment, wrongful arrest, and systemic injustice reported by the offender. When coded under perceived injustice, police mistreatment, and socio-economic frustration, these operational indicators reflect the presentation of noxious stimuli and the removal of positively valued stimuli as conceptualized by general strain theory. The judicial text illustrates how these acute environmental strains served as the underlying contextual trigger for the offender's behavioral trajectory.
Retaliatory Narrative and Catalytic Drive:
Case files and offender disclosures confirm that the crimes were explicitly framed as a direct, calculated response to perceived institutional victimization. Coded as retaliatory motive, revenge narrative, and strain response, these textual elements map directly onto the theoretical construct of strain-induced negative affect leading to corrective (retaliatory) behavior. The primary legal sources validate General Strain Theory by demonstrating how perceived systemic injustice was weaponized as an operational catalyst and moral justification for the crime spree.
Routine Activity Theory and Systemic Vulnerability:
A directed qualitative content analysis of the primary judicial records demonstrates that the spatial and environmental dynamics of the offenses map directly onto the core elements of Routine Activity Theory (Cohen & Felson, 1979). Deductive theoretical mapping links the structural facts established in the court judgments to the convergence of a motivated offender, suitable targets, and an absence of capable guardians over an extended duration.
Motivated Offender and Spatial Convergence:
Primary judicial records document a sustained, deliberate pattern of target selection within controlled private spaces and high-traffic commercial hubs. When coded under spatial convergence and structural failure, these operational indicators reflect the regular spatial intersection of a motivated offender within unmonitored environments. The primary legal text reveals that the offender exploited routine urban movement patterns to orchestrate the offenses without immediate detection.
Suitable Targets and Victim Vulnerability:
Case files establish that the victim cohort consisted predominantly of marginalized children, workingclass minors, and runaways encountered in public transit points and market hubs. Coded as vulnerable targets and runaway status, these operational indicators align with environmental victimization frameworks (Finkelhor, 2008). The structural pre-conditions of the urban landscape rendered these youth "ideal victims" (Christie, 1986), characterized by diminished protective scaffolding and heightened exposure to predation.
Absence of Capable Guardians:
The primary legal documentation explicitly emphasizes the structural failure of socio-legal protection mechanisms and a total lack of institutional oversight. Coded under absence of capable guardians and systemic negligence, these conditions created an environment entirely devoid of effective monitoring. The judicial records validate Routine Activity Theory by illustrating how this systemic institutional vacuum permitted the continuous, undetected convergence of offender and target over a prolonged timeframe.
Social Learning Theory Integration:
A directed qualitative content analysis of the primary judicial documentation reveals a distinct but limited alignment with Social Learning Theory (Bandura, 1971). Deductive theoretical mapping indicates that while specific operational techniques were learned, social learning processes served as secondary facilitators rather than primary catalytic drivers in this case.
Operational Learning and Methodological Adaptation:
Primary judicial records document that the offender demonstrated specific technical competencies, such as methods for evidence destruction and avoiding immediate detection. Coded under learnt behaviors, prior exposures, and institutional conditioning, these operational indicators reflect learned criminal techniques acquired through prior life experiences and exposure to systemic environments. The legal text confirms that these technical skills allowed for the efficient execution and concealment of the offenses over time.
Secondary Role Relative to Core Drivers
Case files and trial findings indicate an absence of ongoing differential association or active criminal peer networks driving the crime spree. Coded under differential association and criminal rationalizations, the qualitative evidence confirms that the core drivers of the offending were rooted in severe psychopathic traits and acute strain responses rather than peer modeling or shared subcultural values. The primary legal sources thus validate Social Learning Theory in a strictly limited capacity—explaining technical execution rather than the fundamental etiology of the crimes.
Discussion:
The application of a directed qualitative content analysis to the Javed Iqbal case provides critical insights into how established western criminological theories perform when mapped against an extreme, nonWestern serial homicide corpus. Rather than relying on inductively derived themes, this study systematically evaluated case data against four pre-established theoretical frameworks: Psychopathy Theory, Social Learning Theory, General Strain Theory, and Routine Activity Theory.
Synthesis of Theoretical Alignment:
The case of Javed Iqbal illustrates that there are many difficulties in the investigation, prosecution and theorizing about extreme serial murder in a non-Western legal context. The findings from this case support criminological studies in demonstrating that serial homicide is not usually caused by one particular factor but rather by several severe psychopathic personality disorders, uncontrolled public spaces, strong personal grudges, and technical knowledge of how to kill efficiently (*State v. Javed Iqbal*, 2000; Hare, 2013; Cohen & Felson, 1979). On the other hand, the legal process in this case indicates a strong contradiction in the post-arrest situation when state punitive objectives were clashing with the constitutional rights and religious jurisprudence (*Federal Shariat Court Appeal No. 12/L*, 2007). In relation to the psychological profile of the criminal, there is no doubt that judicial documents have provided evidence of the behavioral characteristics of clinical psychopaths. Trial records indicate that the offender exhibited traits of cold and calculating thought process, had kept detailed notes of his victims, attempted to influence court proceedings, and lacked remorse. All of these behavioral tendencies are consistent with the characteristics described in the PCL-R (Psychopathy ChecklistRevised) by Hare (1991, 2003) including Factor 1 traits such as lack of emotional empathy and Factor 2 traits associated with an antisocial lifestyle. However, although psychopathy helps to understand the emotional aspects of why the offender could commit such crimes, internal personality traits do not explain the time-related issues related to these crimes (Kamrani, 2024). To justify the choice of victims, the modus operandi, and overall chronology of events, it is necessary to take into account the interaction between a number of criminological theories. Indeed, the offender consistently targeted runaways who were highly vulnerable children, located in crowded and unsupervised locations such as gaming centers and transport junctions. In this case, it is possible to point to Routine Activity Theory (Cohen & Felson, 1979) since the lack of proper protection system for children resulted in the absence of adequate guardianship (Christie, 1986; Finkelhor, 2008). While psychopathy was a source of motivation, routine activities provided the opportunity. General Strain Theory (Agnew, 1992) can be used to explain the reason that triggered the murders. Indeed, court documents prove the offender's extreme anger toward the previous mistreatment and wrongful arrest by the police. Thus, personal grievances served as the impetus which turned latent psychopathic behaviors into a real threat for the society (Sohail, 2002). Moreover, Social Learning Theory (Bandura, 1977) helps explain how the crimes were carried out, as learned methods for handling chemicals and destroying evidence in acid were used to delay detection and prolong impunity (Akers & Sellers, 2016). This case highlights important issues related to human rights and law in the context of the sentencing imposed by the trial court. As a result of public pressure, the trial court mandated that the offender be publicly executed and then have his body dissolved in acid, giving more weightage to punishment and deterrent measures (Sohail, 2002). However, on appeal, the Federal Shariat Court rejected the dissolution order, stating that it is a violation of Article 14 of the Constitution of Pakistan which ensures human dignity and goes against the principles of *Sharia* and the usual rules of prisons. This ruling is consistent with the idea that regardless of how terrible a crime may be, the state cannot go beyond the constitutional limits while passing a verdict on it (Kamrani, 2024). Ultimately the case of Javed Iqbal shows clearly a limit in the effectiveness of Western criminology theory when applied in the non-Western context. The theories of Psychopathy, Routine Activity, Strain, and Social Learning Theory have successfully managed to provide an explanation for crime causation, victim selection, and criminal acts themselves. But at the point where the crime offender moves into the legal process, all explanations are exhausted. In countries such as Pakistan, the trial process and sentencing process are based on an elaborate structure of the constitution, statutes, and Islamic law.
Retaliatory Narrative and Catalytic Drive:
Case files and offender disclosures confirm that the crimes were explicitly framed as a direct, calculated response to perceived institutional victimization. Coded as retaliatory motive, revenge narrative, and strain response, these textual elements map directly onto the theoretical construct of strain-induced negative affect leading to corrective (retaliatory) behavior. The primary legal sources validate General Strain Theory by demonstrating how perceived systemic injustice was weaponized as an operational catalyst and moral justification for the crime spree.
Policy Recommendations:
- Centralized Child Protection Infrastructure: Establish a provincial and national Child Protection Authority with mandatory digital registries for Unsheltered, marginalized juveniles and missing youth.
- Specialized Behavioral & Profiling Units: Integrate criminal profiling and forensic behavioral science modules into police training academies to identify violent crime patterns early.
- Regulation of Hazardous Chemicals: Enforce strict legal oversight and reporting mechanisms for the commercial acquisition of industrial corrosive agents (specifically hydrochloric acid) and lethal chemical compounds. Restricting open access to dangerous chemicals dismantles the operational execution methods favored by violent offenders for evidence destruction.
- Institutional Accountability & Police Reforms: Establish independent internal oversight mechanisms to investigate public grievances against law enforcement misconduct, preventing the cycle of institutional strain and retaliatory hostility.
Conclusion:
The Javed iqbal case underscore how personal pathology, institutional problems, and open public spaces enable serial killings in South Asian context. In this case, the psychopath theory helps understand the development of the mind of an offender who commits serial killings. However, the vulnerability of the victims is accounted for by routine activity theory that identifies street children of the marginal community as the targets for violence. At the same time, personal strain specifically the abuse Iqbal was subjected to by the local police served as the trigger that made him commit retaliatory violence. This case also indicates the major drawback of traditional criminological theories, which cannot provide an answer to the question of how sentences are negotiated and determined in courts that combine the secular law with the Islamic one. The study concludes that understanding serial murder in the non-Western world requires taking into account several theoretical approaches. Successful prevention of such crimes can be achieved through psychological profiling, child protection measures, and reforms of policing institutions, as the reasons for committing crimes and negotiation of sentences are governed by different laws.
References:
- Agnew, R. (1992). Foundation for a General Strain Theory of Crime and Delinquency. Criminology, 30(1), 47–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1992.tb01093.x
- Akers, R. L., & Sellers, C. S. (2016). Criminological theories: Introduction, evaluation, and application (7th ed.). Oxford University Press.
- Bandura, A. (1971). Social Learning Theory. Contemporary Sociology, 7(1). https://www.asecib.ase.ro/mps/Bandura_SocialLearningTheory.pdf
- BBC News | SOUTH ASIA | Pakistan “serial killer” (1999) http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/584373.stm
- BBC News | SOUTH ASIA | Death for Pakistan serial killer (2000) http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/678553.stm
- Christie, N. (1986). The Ideal Victim. From Crime Policy to Victim Policy, 17–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-08305-3_2
- Cohen, L. E., & Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44(4), 588–608. https://doi.org/10.2307/2094589
- Federal Shariat Court of Pakistan. (2007). Judgment in Criminal Appeals No. 13/L and 14/L of 2000: Mohammad Nadeem alias Deemi and Mohammad Sabir v. The State. https://www.federalshariatcourt.gov.pk/
- Finkelhor, D. (2008). Childhood victimization: Violence, crime, and abuse in the lives of young people. Oxford University Press.
- Hare, R. D. (2013). Hare Psychopathy Checklist–Revised (2nd Edition) (PCL–R). Encyclopedia of Psychology and Law. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412959537.n134
- Hickey, E. W. (2015). Serial murderers and their victims (7th ed.). Cengage Learning.
- Holmes, R. M., & Holmes, S. T. (2009). Profiling violent crimes: An investigative tool (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
- Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
- Human Rights Commission of Pakistan. (2001). State of human rights in 2000. Human Rights Commission of Pakistan. http://hrcp-web.org/HRCP%20AR%202000.pdf
- Kamrani, F. (2024). Psychoanalytic interpretation of the killings by Javed Iqbal Mughal aka Kukri. Journal of Professional & Applied Psychology, 5(3), 543–551. https://doi.org/10.52053/jpap.v5i3.299
- Lahore Sessions Court. (2000). Judgment in State v. Javed Iqbal and Others (Unpublished judicial decision). Sessions Court Lahore, Pakistan.
- Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.
This was genuinely fascinating to read! Great work 👏
ReplyDelete